ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: GNSO and the GA. Kent Crispin controlled

  • To: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: GNSO and the GA. Kent Crispin controlled
  • From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:47:18 -0500

Ah, Kent. A spanner in the cogs of progress since way back in the days of the IDNO attempts to form a constituency for Registrants. He was well-rewarded for his work there, don't you think?

On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Hugh Dierker wrote:


Unless certain people in the GNSO are just outright not telling the truth. ICANN staff is directly responsible for denying public participation in the GA. Avri has repeatedly and publicly denied any interference. There is no reason to believe that Glen would have anything to do with such malfeasance. It just makes no sense the Secretariat would get involved.

This fellow has repeatedly bragged, no that is too harsh, boasted is better, that he controls the GA. That he is the one responsible, to no one, in running the only General Assembly list in ICANN. And that he has shut it down. Kent Crispin; http://www.icann.org/en/biog/crispin.htm

This of course is in direct violations of the history and mandate found in the preamble here;
These are legal and scrutinzed by high priced lawyers and formally adopted by a contracting agent of the United States Government.

Which is further explained here:
http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/  --- 2007 9 06 2
Again the self determination of the GA is established in a legally binding document.

(as you can see from this, after fancy lawyering and removal of language -- the GNSO adoption, formally of the list rules took out the role of the GNSO Chair and effectively in a legal ICANN document made me {although yet to be elected} a god) Not fun.

Avri I note in an election last December was elected until a new board is formed. Me -- I get no relief.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>