ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches

  • To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches
  • From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:13:42 +0200


That's a common problem nowadays - independent studies ordered by
dependent parties.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Karl Auerbach
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:15 PM
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Debbie Garside
Subject: Re: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches

kent wrote:

> That would be *enormously* more expensive, given the stringent
> methodology (from page 9):

It seems to me that those who are most demanding of this, the
intellectual property 
protection bar (of which I am a dues paying member), ought to pay for

Those whose privacy is being busted by DNS whois ought not to be forced
to pay for a study 
that has as its ultimate goal a further reduction in their privacy


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>