<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches
- To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:13:42 +0200
Karl,
That's a common problem nowadays - independent studies ordered by
dependent parties.
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Karl Auerbach
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:15 PM
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Debbie Garside
Subject: Re: [ga] Whois Accuracy Study Launches
kent wrote:
> That would be *enormously* more expensive, given the stringent
verification
> methodology (from page 9):
It seems to me that those who are most demanding of this, the
intellectual property
protection bar (of which I am a dues paying member), ought to pay for
this.
Those whose privacy is being busted by DNS whois ought not to be forced
to pay for a study
that has as its ultimate goal a further reduction in their privacy
rights.
--karl--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|