ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] DNS Root-Level Pollution

  • To: David Scott <tlda@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] DNS Root-Level Pollution
  • From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:47:01 -0700


David Scott wrote:

If ICANN's structure where to completely fail, I mean 100% failure, what is the real impact.

Here's what I wrote about this a few years back:

http://www.cavebear.com/cbblog-archives/000233.html

What would happen were ICANN to vanish in a poof of money-colored smoke?

There would be an immediate and immense wailing from trademark law firms as the partners rend their expensive suits. And the large registries, particularly Verisign, would weep at the loss of the a plaint regulatory agency that has gifted them magnificently and munificently over the years.

But from the point of view of internet users things would pretty much remain the same.

ICANN is deeply and heavily engaged in the regulation of business practices. The anti-trust questions of that role have never been squarely faced. But nevertheless, ICANN regulates the domain name marketplace.

That marketplace would not stop if the regulatory hand of ICANN were lifted.

From the point of view of packets moving across the internet, ICANN is almost vanishingly absent from the actual operational aspects. The root server operators have no relationship with ICANN except the L root, which ICANN operates via its IANA role, and the F root which has a contract best described as a mutual-hands-off-but-recognize-me pact. The IP address system of the RIRs operates with very little interaction with ICANN. IANA's number role has little day-to-day operational impact. And the exact nature of the ICANN-IANA relationship and its linkage to the IETF and other I-things is not one of clarity.

(I am of the strong belief that the entire operation of DNS does not require the kind of imposed consistency that ICANN claims is necessary. In other words, I think many of the problems that ICANN seems unable to resolve - such as new TLDs - would be better solved in the absence of any ICANN-like regulatory body. But that's a discussion for another day.)

                --karl--




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>