RE: [ga] GA_ISSUE-001: Domain Tasting - Info

["Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Chris...

I have been waiting on some other posts before opening the respective
thread.
Most likely I'll join next week hoping some will have piled up by
Monday.

The links to some documents to look into and think over

1. The Final Report (with the analysis of our dissenting public comments
shrunk into one sentence without verb)
http://www.gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-final-report-domain-tasting-08feb
08.pdf


2. Current Final Proposal ('Motion 2' gaining GNSO super majority vote)
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04981.html


3. My contribution (a harsh one as usual, don't read before getting to
sleep :-))
Check the math; I would also appreciate the George's (Kirikos) analytic
thinking here
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg01253.html


4. The Board Report (a somewhat strangely interesting document)
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/domain-tasting/domain-tasting-board-report-
gnso-council-25apr08.pdf


Dominik

P.S. If possible respond to the very last post on the thread to keep the
posts cumulated.


-----Original Message-----
From: chris@xxxxxx [mailto:chris@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 6:48 PM
To: Dominik Filipp; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] GA_ISSUE-001: Domain Tasting - Info

I'm with you on option 1 Dominik. 

Chris McElroy, NameCritic, Inc.
http://www.blogcontentprovider.com



----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 4:08 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] GA_ISSUE-001: Domain Tasting - Info


> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The domain tasting issue has been reopened for public comment input
till
> 21 May. That is why I am reopening the issue thread.
> 
> In my opinion, the GA Formal Resolution could contain an opposition to
> the existing 10% AGP cap proposal by concluding to revive the
> deliberation on the issue in a new GNSO working group with public
> participation properly addressing all possibilities including the AGP
> elimination.
> 
> Another choice would be to continue on the AGP pros & cons
deliberation
> as was the original intent.
> 
> I would personally go for the first option as the current motion has
> gained a super majority voice in GNSO and should therefore be
> discussed/opposed in the first place.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Dominik
> 
> 
> Source: http://www.icann.org/public_comment/#dt-motion-21may08
> 
>