ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] GA not TLDA

  • To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] GA not TLDA
  • From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:42:56 +0100

Hi Joe
 
What exactly do you disagree with?  My emailing members reminding them that
this is the GA and not the TLDA?  Or perhaps my asking members to conduct
correspondence not relevant to the GA in private?  I believe this is covered
by our list rules. 
 
If you wish to discuss this further please email me and the Chair off-list.
 
Best regards
 
Debbie Garside
List Monitor


  _____  

From: publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Joe Baptista
Sent: 15 April 2008 21:38
To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] GA not TLDA




On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


Please can I remind members that this is the GA mailing list and not the
TLDA.
 
I would appreciate it if this sort of correspondence was conducted in
private in future as it serves no relevance, that I can see, for the GA.  I
am happy to be corrected if members feel differently.


I disagree with you.  Again you are acting independently without consulting
as is the established procedure with the list monitors and chair.

kindest regards
Joe Baptista
List Monitor

 


 
Best regards
 
Debbie Garside
List Monitor


  _____  

From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Karl Peters - TLDA
Sent: 16 April 2008 04:56
To: Thomas Baxter
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Notice to Jeff Williams Re: GA list archives problems?



Mr. Baxter,

       Perhaps the main reason you were unable to write to the TLDA lists
could best be explained by this earlier post from you in response to my
commenting on your use of foul language on a public list. Your quote from
March 16, 2008 follows below in red.




> . . . 

>

> Congrats - you managed to chase away a potential member.

> 

> Screw your authoritarian probation stuff - REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST NOW. I
don't want your junk in my mailbox anymore.







       Actions (and inaction) have consequences. When you so eloquently
asked to be removed from our lists, your request was honored. When you
should like to rejoin, that will be honored, as well. (on probation)




-Karl E. Peters




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>