Re: Got a beef with ICANN? INS is still here. (was Re: [ga] Call for Elimination of AGP)

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <chris@xxxxxx>
To: "John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: Got a beef with ICANN? INS is still here. (was Re: [ga] Call 
for Elimination of AGP)

> John, if you read the archives you will find that many here have 
> championed the cause of getting those roots included. I would love nothing 
> more than the inclusion of all roots and the TLDs that are in those roots. 
> In other words, you are definitely preaching to the choir.
> Chris McElroy, NameCritic, Inc.
> http://www.thingsthatjustpissmeoff.com
Chris, I know many have championed them, I just ran out of time to keep up
the fight. Its kind of hard to do that when we can't seem to get a serious 
group
together to make progress.

ICANN just wont have this. They believe that they have the right to prevent
the free enterprise practice of letting all players enter the market. This 
allows
for multiple business models and maximum choice to prevail in the 
marketplace.
Hopefully the new TLDA will make progress and we'll have a viable root
zone that is monitored by a fair, impartial group that applies the same 
rule-of-law
type of objectiveness to TLDs. This will help heal all of the recent damage 
done
the INS's reputation in the past years and will get the greater world to 
take a look
at us again.

Thanks for your support of the INS. I've been at this for a decade and still 
can't seem
to wash my hands of it as hopeless, as dark as the night is sometimes.

------------------------------------------
John Palmer - American Webmasters, Inc
######################################
Join the Baptista Truth Watch at
http://lair.lionpost.net/mailman/listinfo/Baptista-Offenses
######################################