RE: [council] NCA Assignments

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I meant to say Terry not Andrei.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:03 AM
> To: William Drake
> Cc: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] NCA Assignments
> 
> 
> What is the NCSG position?  Are you opposed to seating Andrei 
> in the Non-Contracted Party House?  If so, please say so even 
> if it is just from the NCUC.  I happened to talk to RrSG 
> ExCom members and am aware of their position but I will let 
> them communicate that.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:00 AM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > Cc: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> > Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
> > 
> > Hi Chuck,
> > 
> > On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > I do not believe your assessment is correct Avri.  My
> > understanding is
> > > that Kristina communicated that the CSG supported seating
> > Terry in the
> > > Non-Contracted Party House but I will let her speak for herself.
> > > Regarding the RySG, I sent an email supporting that as well.
> > 
> > Like I guess Avri I must have missed your message, when did 
> you send 
> > it?
> > 
> > Either way, how would two of four SGs be sufficient?
> > 
> > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > >> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:26 AM
> > >> To: Council GNSO
> > >> Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Because the motion the council passed required that the 4 SG in 
> > >> consensus through their reps either agree to the NCA
> > recommendations
> > >> or come up with another plan.
> > >>
> > >> As far as I can tell only the CSG agreed with the NCA
> > recommendations
> > >> and there was no consensus on another plan by
> > >> 7 Oct, hence we fall through to the random selection.
> > >>
> > >> a.
> > >>
> > >> On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:11, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Avri,
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the
> > >> NCP House.
> > >>> Why is this being ignored ?
> > >>> Philip
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> > ***********************************************************
> > William J. Drake
> > Senior Associate
> > Centre for International Governance
> > Graduate Institute of International and
> >   Development Studies
> > Geneva, Switzerland
> > william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> > ***********************************************************
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>