Re: [council] NCA Assignments

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> I do not believe your assessment is correct Avri.  My understanding is
> that Kristina communicated that the CSG supported seating Terry in the
> Non-Contracted Party House but I will let her speak for herself.
> Regarding the RySG, I sent an email supporting that as well.
Like I guess Avri I must have missed your message, when did you send it?

Either way, how would two of four SGs be sufficient?

Bill
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:26 AM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Because the motion the council passed required that the 4 SG
> > in consensus through their reps either agree to the NCA
> > recommendations or come up with another plan.
> >
> > As far as I can tell only the CSG agreed with the NCA
> > recommendations and there was no consensus on another plan by
> > 7 Oct, hence we fall through to the random selection.
> >
> > a.
> >
> > On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:11, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> >
> > > Avri,
> > >
> > > I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the
> > NCP House.
> > > Why is this being ignored ?
> > > Philip
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************