ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] NCA Assignments

Hi Chuck,

On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

I do not believe your assessment is correct Avri.  My understanding is
that Kristina communicated that the CSG supported seating Terry in the
Non-Contracted Party House but I will let her speak for herself.
Regarding the RySG, I sent an email supporting that as well.

Like I guess Avri I must have missed your message, when did you send it?

Either way, how would two of four SGs be sufficient?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:26 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments


Because the motion the council passed required that the 4 SG
in consensus through their reps either agree to the NCA
recommendations or come up with another plan.

As far as I can tell only the CSG agreed with the NCA
recommendations and there was no consensus on another plan by
7 Oct, hence we fall through to the random selection.


On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:11, Philip Sheppard wrote:


I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the
NCP House.
Why is this being ignored ?

William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>