ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Council meeting today


The idea is to vote on this, and any amendments - had there been any, today.

The public comment period is for the Board, not for the Council. rob will explain the process at the beginning of the meeting.

I asked the ICANN counsel whether the ByLaw permitted absentee ballot in this case and was told: no.

It will never be more complete then it is now until after the Board votes on it at the end of the month.

As I understand it, the Board thinks that the clause on Board elections does not need to be in the ByLaws. But if we leave it in, then they will fill it in later.

Thank you for your vote, unfortunately I cannot record it.



On 9 Jul 2009, at 13:54, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:


I cannot make the call today as more pressing matters have arisen. If this is subject to proxy voting, then I will vote 'no' on the motion, since we
still do not have a complete document to review and vote upon, and the
document we do have is still out for public comment for another 20 days. While that public comment forum is very confusing, in any event we should never be voting on a document that is out for public comment, until comments
have been reviewed and integrated as appropriate, right?


Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>