Re: [council] Council meeting today

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

The idea is to vote on this, and any amendments - had there been any,  
today.
The public comment period is for the Board, not for the Council.  rob  
will explain the process at the beginning of the meeting.
I asked the ICANN counsel whether the ByLaw permitted absentee ballot  
in this case and was told: no.
It will never be more complete then it is now until after the Board  
votes on it at the end of the month.
As I understand it, the Board thinks that the clause on Board  
elections does not need to be in the ByLaws.  But if we leave it in,  
then they will fill it in later.
Thank you for your vote, unfortunately I cannot record it.

Thanks


a.

On 9 Jul 2009, at 13:54, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I cannot make the call today as more pressing matters have arisen.   
> If this
> is subject to proxy voting, then I will vote 'no' on the motion,  
> since we
> still do not have a complete document to review and vote upon, and the
> document we do have is still out for public comment for another 20  
> days.
> While that public comment forum is very confusing, in any event we  
> should
> never be voting on a document that is out for public comment, until  
> comments
> have been reviewed and integrated as appropriate, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
> 548 Market Street
> San Francisco, CA  94104
> +1.415.738.8087
> www.rodenbaugh.com