RE: [council] Council meeting today

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Let's remember that the sole purpose of this meeting was to act on the
proposed Bylaws changes.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:54 PM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] Council meeting today
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I cannot make the call today as more pressing matters have 
> arisen.  If this is subject to proxy voting, then I will vote 
> 'no' on the motion, since we still do not have a complete 
> document to review and vote upon, and the document we do have 
> is still out for public comment for another 20 days.
> While that public comment forum is very confusing, in any 
> event we should never be voting on a document that is out for 
> public comment, until comments have been reviewed and 
> integrated as appropriate, right?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
> 548 Market Street
> San Francisco, CA  94104
> +1.415.738.8087
> www.rodenbaugh.com
> 
> 
>