<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Issue #9 resolution
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Issue #9 resolution
- From: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:39:08 +0530
- Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=wmmRAV18pMkDIKeD18Uj9p39GcwS4afV0YH4YJDHlf4=; b=PPXbYzNplSRGyNi6ajSMtOFilix3I/lG7Ijh+Gh9gwmM0RAnC86UPK0NpEzMheziN2lobfjBF4QjgnLyfw4IMAxDOebkM6/6sCp5jMsb1wQQ2TP9cVjRNEicoKgD7tEQL4gI/ctHuSwWE/Et1xtH7QjJ7pB3JssWyiNDZVi4Rus=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=t3aYPQRqNx95PqnNYfbFJhyTBLsKQ+r6M9IpLh2ElrSmPYirRQHC8XE0WNNg9pf1UsDic9w7nYFSEzjLwSabSrmVxaVAKa8E5UvqMlkAIF7simvSTSvlX199hPPLg/DNqlHgn+bI0sN/BWbgMEjV7USTTj9vpHIsmMSGz+y6/3U=
- In-reply-to: <25C32731-46EE-4DA5-ADD1-4216F78C214C@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1D9780B7-DC53-4849-A218-1961F0E9FCC7@psg.com> <07ac01c86e32$93e3a910$bbaafb30$@org> <25C32731-46EE-4DA5-ADD1-4216F78C214C@psg.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree Avri
Olga
2008/2/13, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>:
>
>
> does anyone disagree?
>
> a.
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2008, at 16:51, Edmon Chung wrote:
>
> > I think #9 is resolved unless others feel uncomfortable.
> > I am ok to leave the wording as the original (without any amendments.
> > Edmon
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|