ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[Fwd: [council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues]

  • To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [Fwd: [council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues]
  • From: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:26:27 +0200
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20070728)


This is very clear, thank you.
Should we publish it on the draft document page, and for that purpose would you like the red portions to stay red?

Thanks so much,


-------- Message original --------
Sujet:  [council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues
Report on IDN Issues
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:29:15 -0400
De:     Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pour ::         Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attached is the latest version of the proposed *GNSO Comments in
Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues*.  Please note
that this version was created from the GNSO WG final draft by making the
following two non-material edits:

   1. An executive summary was added:  a) to do this the first three
      paragraphs were made into an 'Introduction' section, including
      moving some text in the 3rd paragraph into the new 'Executive
      Summary'; b) the 'Executive Summary' was written by listing what
      appeared to be 'the most important points from the GNSO responses
      that are contained in the main body of the document'; c) the
      section containing the main body of the report (Parts A and B) was
      titled 'Responses to Issues Paper Questions'.
   2. In Part A, paragraph 1, links were inserted to information about
      the IDN technical requirements and tests.

For ease of identifying the revisions, they are highlighted in the
attached file.  In reviewing the Executive Summary I suggest asking the
following questions: i) are all of the bulleted items points that should
be included in the Executive Summary? and ii) are there any points not
included that should be added?

Note that the changes made in this version were sent to WG members for
their review and comment and the changes made were result of the
feedback received.

If you have any questions, please let me know.  This version of the
draft comments should be used for discussion by the Council in L.A.

Chuck Gomes

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN

Attachment: ccNSO GAC Issues Paper re IDN ccTLDs - Draft GNSO Comments WG Revised 12Oct 07.doc
Description: MS-Word document

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>