ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:29:15 -0400
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcgM0+JY7CIQ7/h+S2OyYobLxtMVSg==
  • Thread-topic: GNSO Comments in Response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues

Attached is the latest version of the proposed GNSO Comments in Response
to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on IDN Issues.  Please note that this
version was created from the GNSO WG final draft by making the following
two non-material edits:

1.      An executive summary was added:  a) to do this the first three
paragraphs were made into an 'Introduction' section, including moving
some text in the 3rd paragraph into the new 'Executive Summary'; b) the
'Executive Summary' was written by listing what appeared to be 'the most
important points from the GNSO responses that are contained in the main
body of the document'; c) the section containing the main body of the
report (Parts A and B) was titled 'Responses to Issues Paper Questions'.
2.      In Part A, paragraph 1, links were inserted to information about
the IDN technical requirements and tests.

For ease of identifying the revisions, they are highlighted in the
attached file.  In reviewing the Executive Summary I suggest asking the
following questions: i) are all of the bulleted items points that should
be included in the Executive Summary? and ii) are there any points not
included that should be added?
 
Note that the changes made in this version were sent to WG members for
their review and comment and the changes made were result of the
feedback received.
 
If you have any questions, please let me know.  This version of the
draft comments should be used for discussion by the Council in L.A. 
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

Attachment: ccNSO GAC Issues Paper re IDN ccTLDs - Draft GNSO Comments WG Revised 12 Oct 07.doc
Description: ccNSO GAC Issues Paper re IDN ccTLDs - Draft GNSO Comments WG Revised 12 Oct 07.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>