ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution

  • To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:00:30 -0700
  • Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.22

And mine.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 6:19 am
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


That is my understanding as well.

Chuck


Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent:   Wednesday, February 13, 2008 06:48 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Council GNSO
Subject:        [council] Issue #5 resolution


Hi,

I believe we have all accepted the rewrite of Executive summary #5 to 
read:

  We support efforts to determine the feasibility of an interim 
solution whereby a limited number of countries or  territories 
designated in the ISO 3166-1 list that have special needs would be 
granted IDN labels in the near term provided that no IDN TLDs 
associated with countries or territories are introduced earlier than 
IDN gTLDs  without prior community concurrence.



does anyone disagree?


a.







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>