<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
- To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:00:30 -0700
- Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.22
And mine.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 6:19 am
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
That is my understanding as well.
Chuck
Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 06:48 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Issue #5 resolution
Hi,
I believe we have all accepted the rewrite of Executive summary #5 to
read:
We support efforts to determine the feasibility of an interim
solution whereby a limited number of countries or territories
designated in the ISO 3166-1 list that have special needs would be
granted IDN labels in the near term provided that no IDN TLDs
associated with countries or territories are introduced earlier than
IDN gTLDs without prior community concurrence.
does anyone disagree?
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|