<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Issue #9 resolution
- To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Issue #9 resolution
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:57:24 -0700
- Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.22
No disagreement on leaving #9 as is (without Edmon's proposed changes).
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Issue #9 resolution
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 6:22 am
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I would like to see confirmation from Tim because he raised the concern.
Chuck
Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 06:46 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Issue #9 resolution
does anyone disagree?
a.
On 13 Feb 2008, at 16:51, Edmon Chung wrote:
> I think #9 is resolved unless others feel uncomfortable.
> I am ok to leave the wording as the original (without any amendments.
> Edmon
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|