Re: [ga] Vote on representation first

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

We are all cool here. Anything worth doing will have a few glitches and disagreement and that is helpful in the end. If it was easy everybody would do it. Let us just move forward with the way it is and then hammer out the details once we get some leadership. Perhaps our first should just be elected to help us get things straightened out and then another for long term representation, or maybe that can be done simultaneous. 
   
  We are getting someplace and that is good. I do not care if this is a subset every democracy in the world has officials elected by a subset. If the reps just carry the differing GA message about that would be a great contribution.
   
  Eric

kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  At least Joop is trying to do something Jeff. And voting on this list has 
always been a joke. The polling booth works. I agree we should discuss what 
the options are before joop puts them up, however since no matter what is 
brought to the table you won't agree with it Jeff.

You attacked IcannWiki the same way.

If you keep doing that all there will ever be is this mailing list that 
fails to get anything done.

Is that your goal? Talking about trolling while doing so really sucks.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Williams" 
To: "George Kirikos" 
Cc: "ga" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote on representation first


> George and all,
>
> Well kinda harsh and wrong George. In any event the GNSO
> council is and has always been illegitimate. The GNSO itself is
> and always has been illegitimate as well. Hence why self
> re formation of the GA as a self formed organization is being
> again considered.
>
> However with trolls like Joop, reformation can turn into
> a "mental masturbation" exercise. But I am willing to give
> Joop a chance to cease and desist his recent gamesmanship
> shanagans. He has 2 days by which to do so from where
> I sit.
>
>
> George Kirikos wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> --- Hugh Dierker wrote:
>> > Ok as long as people can come along after the fact and say this
>> > stunk, let us do it over?
>>
>> Let me go on the record ex-ante that this whole "vote" is an exercise
>> in mental masturbation, and doesn't amount to anything constructive.
>>
>> ICANN has a structure -- work within that (or work to change the
>> structure itself). The GA at present is merely an open cross
>> constituency mailing list, a place for bringing out issues for
>> discussion that can sometimes lead to awareness and action within the
>> relevant GNSO constituencies, despite all the trolls. No GA "vote" by
>> some self-selected subset will bind anyone to listen to its so-called
>> "elected representatives". Indeed, we have that already, it's called
>> the GNSO Council.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> George Kirikos
>> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
> 



 
---------------------------------
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.