Re: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yup. Valid in my opinion as well. The IP interests successfully got all of 
their reps on the board and got their way. Why not the registries and others 
involved in tasting doing the same. Not so far fetched.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:26 AM
Subject: RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die


> And are you sure this couldn't have happened? Be sure that things like
> that would never be thrashing out during discussions or meetings. One or
> two years have already passed away and yet the tasting has not been
> raised as an issue despite all that unceasing rush around.
>
> If I asked you what's happened on that recently at ICANN I would bet you
> have nothing to say. Wish I was completely wrong in the assumption.
>
> So, after collecting the significant facts, I would say this potentially
> good inspiracy theory could be pretty valid.
>
> Dominik
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:roberto@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:19 AM
> To: Dominik Filipp; 'Jeff Williams'
> Cc: 'General Assembly of the DNSO'
> Subject: RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
>
> That would work if the person sent to ICANN was instructed to be in
> favour of the tasting and other similar practices.
> It so happens that he is openly against, so another potentially good
> conspiracy theory failing miserably...
>
> Cheers,
> Roberto