ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Has there been any progress on a .REL gTLD?

  • To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Has there been any progress on a .REL gTLD?
  • From: Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:50:10 -0700

Matt and all,

  Again thank you for your response.  I thought I did answer your posed
questions.  If I missed one, than
of course that was not intended.  Thank you for answering my posed
questions as well!  And no, the
response was one that was posed to the list not just from a private post
from Karl.

  BTW, I agree with your final answer to my original question.  So again
thank you!  That wasn't so
hard was it?  BTW also, just think of all the new business opportunities
that possibly could come
your way with a new gTLD such as .REL, Matt.

God bless,
Jeffrey A. Williams
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 4/18/12
CISO
Phone: 214-245-2647


On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Matthew Pemble <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I note that Jeff is clearly at least de minimis practicing to be a
> professional politician because he has ignored any of the questions posed
> and gone off on one.
>
> However, to indulge him. Because it is the weekend and I've had some wine
> with dinner as well as the pre-prandial glass ...
>
> On 27 April 2012 18:37, Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>   As now history has shown us, us.kids and .xxx have been significantly
>> unsuccessful in achieving the stated goals
>> by which they were promoted.    A .REL may indeed also suffer the same
>> fate, but also has a chance if done carefully
>> and diligently.  Is such not worthy of the effort and/or consideration?
>>  My answer is yes.  What's yours Matt?  If it is NO
>> as I suspect, than why NO?
>>
>
> Hey, of course. Let people make the effort. It might work, and make the
> world a better place. It might not, but, hey, their choice, their effort.
>
> As a note, to Karl particularly: did Jeff post a personal response to the
> list? If so, can we have him taken round the back of the virtual bike-sheds
> and thoroughly castigated, please. My apols in advance to Jeff if both my
> email and the archives failed to register Karl's response to the list.
>
> M.
>
> --
> Matthew Pemble
> Technical Director, Idrach Ltd
>
> Mobile: +44 (0) 7595 652175
> Office: + 44 (0) 1324 820690
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>