<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Re: Ballot to determine whether ICANN Registrars favor or oppose Domain Tasting.
- To: russ@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Re: Ballot to determine whether ICANN Registrars favor or oppose Domain Tasting.
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:41:19 -0500
- Cc: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4790F56B.7080309@naugus.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20080117095547.9924.qmail@qmt.tidewinds.com> <4790F56B.7080309@naugus.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 18-Jan-08, at 1:52 PM, Russ Goodwin wrote:
My company chose to vote for the poorly worded option "vote in
favour of domain tasting" (which refers to View 2) because we do not
support ICANN's attempt to regulate the market. In general we
believe ICANN has and continues to overstep their bounds as a
technical coordinator.
This is a false argument. ICANN is not a regulator. It is only
implementing the policies that the community, mostly private sector,
have agreed on. This is what we as registrars signed up for when we
became accredited.
It is perfectly reasonable for ICANN to adopt a consensus policy
eliminating or modifying the AGP.
It is also perfectly reasonable for you and others to argue for their
self-interest, but I think its important that we don't let the
rhetoric cloud the view of those that are still looking to make up
their mind on the issue. We are a long way from establishing consensus
policy on this issue - perhaps at this early stage we should attempt
to keep our discussions fact-based and non-judgemental.
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|