<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
- To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:06:37 +1000
- In-reply-to: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A031D17E3@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <1A0AABD464D03F43BC34963252162FB204F36786@companyweb> <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A031D17E3@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acg3XeQ7smtDRQYWS7iDJ+6JzreVmwAGA0eQABgG3hA=
- Thread-topic: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
Hello Jon,
>> Personally, I think that ICANN should provide financial support to
the constituencies. In turn, we, as a constituency, would decide
whether to use the funding for travel, professional support,
administrative support, etc.
Do you think the financial support should be equal - or in some
proportion to membership/involvement?
One of the problems at the moment is that there is not much incentive
for existing constituencies to grow their membership. So a
constituency can be operated by one or two active members that dominate
all the discussion around their own personal views, rather than the
views of a larger more diverse constituency. For example it is
interesting to see how much harder the registrars constituency with a
large diverse membership finds forming a common position compared to
some other constituencies.
You could potentially have some concept of matching funds.
E.g Assume for discussion that each constituency charges $100 per member
and that ICANN administers the membership payments.
ICANN could then assign the membership payments for management by the
constituency plus some percentage of general ICANN funding - e.g 100% of
fees up to some cap.
So for example lets say ICANN provided up to $20,000 per constituency
(for a total of $120,000 across 6 constituencies) on a matching basis.
To reach that level of support you would need 200 members paying $100.
That would give the constituency a total budget of $40,000. Of course
a constituency would also be free to charge a higher amount - e.g $200
per member, and the ICANN fees could still be matched at $100 per
member. So a constituency with 200 members, would then have a budget
of $60,0000. This ensures that there is still an incentive to grow
membership rather than setting up a constituency with a single member
paying $20,000 and then getting an additional $20,000 from ICANN.
Note the amounts I have chosen above are just for example to illustrate
the concept.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|