Re: [registrars] Rules of Procedure Motion

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jon,

I endorse the new Rules of Procedure. Please note that that the current 
document still contains the 5 endorsements instead of the 3 as decided 
in LUX. My endorsement is for the RoP amended to 3.

Best,

tom

Am 21.07.2005 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:
> Thanks Marcus.  Jon
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> I endorse the Rules of Procedure motion. I also suggest to resend it to
> the list with a more apropriate subject.
> 
> Yours,
> Marcus
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:34 AM
> To: Robert F Connelly; Registrars Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts
> 
> Bob:  
> 
> The schedule looks right to me.  
> 
> Also, attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of
> Procedure.  The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number
> of required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the quorum
> provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to 10 to make
> it consistent with the Bylaws.
> 
> Bob has filed the motion.  I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross
> has as well.  If we could have at least three more voters endorse the
> motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same ballot.
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38 AM
> To: Registrars Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts
> 
> At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >this motion has been endorsed by 5 members of the constituency
> >
> >Jordyn Buchanan
> >Marcus Faure
> >Bruce Tonkin
> >Paul Stahura
> >Tom Keller
> >
> >I therefore ask to move the motion to a vote at the earliest time
> >possible.
> 
> Dear Thomas: I also endorsed it.
> 
> Under the old Rules of Procedure, I believe we need 14 days after the
> draft 
> has been confirmed, then another 4 days,
> 
> I am traveling and have not confirmed that time schedule.  I recognize
> that 
> time is of the essence in this motion.
> 
> I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time schedule.  He can
> reach 
> me at 1.702.372.2890.
> 
> Regards, BobC
> 
> 
> >Best,
> >
> >tom
> 




Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w