RE: [registrars] Rules of Procedure Motion
Good catch Tom. Thanks. Attached are the correct versions. We still need one more endorsement. Jon -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 3:42 AM To: Nevett, Jonathon Cc: Robert F Connelly; Registrars Constituency; Marcus Faure Subject: Re: [registrars] Rules of Procedure Motion Jon, I endorse the new Rules of Procedure. Please note that that the current document still contains the 5 endorsements instead of the 3 as decided in LUX. My endorsement is for the RoP amended to 3. Best, tom Am 21.07.2005 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon: > Thanks Marcus. Jon > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > I endorse the Rules of Procedure motion. I also suggest to resend it to > the list with a more apropriate subject. > > Yours, > Marcus > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:34 AM > To: Robert F Connelly; Registrars Constituency > Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts > > Bob: > > The schedule looks right to me. > > Also, attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of > Procedure. The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number > of required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the quorum > provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to 10 to make > it consistent with the Bylaws. > > Bob has filed the motion. I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross > has as well. If we could have at least three more voters endorse the > motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same ballot. > > > Thanks. > > Jon > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38 AM > To: Registrars Constituency > Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts > > At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller wrote: > >Hello all, > > > >this motion has been endorsed by 5 members of the constituency > > > >Jordyn Buchanan > >Marcus Faure > >Bruce Tonkin > >Paul Stahura > >Tom Keller > > > >I therefore ask to move the motion to a vote at the earliest time > >possible. > > Dear Thomas: I also endorsed it. > > Under the old Rules of Procedure, I believe we need 14 days after the > draft > has been confirmed, then another 4 days, > > I am traveling and have not confirmed that time schedule. I recognize > that > time is of the essence in this motion. > > I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time schedule. He can > reach > me at 1.702.372.2890. > > Regards, BobC > > > >Best, > > > >tom > Gruss, tom (__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w Attachment:
RC Rules of Procedure July 22 2005.doc Attachment:
RC Rules of Procedure July 22 2005.pdf |