ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] Rules of Procedure Motion

  • To: "Robert F Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [registrars] Rules of Procedure Motion
  • From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:54:36 -0400
  • Cc: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWN6aiOWLPBNXMiTSiFVkJ+xZThjQAFiIAgAAEAqQA=
  • Thread-topic: Rules of Procedure Motion

Thanks Marcus.  Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
I endorse the Rules of Procedure motion. I also suggest to resend it to
the list with a more apropriate subject.

Yours,
Marcus

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:34 AM
To: Robert F Connelly; Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts

Bob:  

The schedule looks right to me.  

Also, attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of
Procedure.  The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number
of required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the quorum
provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to 10 to make
it consistent with the Bylaws.

Bob has filed the motion.  I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross
has as well.  If we could have at least three more voters endorse the
motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same ballot.


Thanks.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts

At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>this motion has been endorsed by 5 members of the constituency
>
>Jordyn Buchanan
>Marcus Faure
>Bruce Tonkin
>Paul Stahura
>Tom Keller
>
>I therefore ask to move the motion to a vote at the earliest time
>possible.

Dear Thomas: I also endorsed it.

Under the old Rules of Procedure, I believe we need 14 days after the
draft 
has been confirmed, then another 4 days,

I am traveling and have not confirmed that time schedule.  I recognize
that 
time is of the essence in this motion.

I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time schedule.  He can
reach 
me at 1.702.372.2890.

Regards, BobC


>Best,
>
>tom

Attachment: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.doc
Description: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.doc

Attachment: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.pdf
Description: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>