ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts

  • To: "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:48:41 -0700
  • Cc: Robert F Connelly <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<div>I also endorse the motion on the Rules of Procedure.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>FWIW, after several discussions internally, Go Daddy will also be
supporting the motion on Whois Conflicts.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tim</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE:
[registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts<BR>From: "Nevett,
Jonathon" &lt;jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Thu, July 21,
2005 9:34 am<BR>To: "Robert F Connelly" &lt;BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;,
"Registrars<BR>Constituency" &lt;registrars@xxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>Bob:
&nbsp;<BR><BR>The schedule looks right to me. &nbsp;<BR><BR>Also,
attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of<BR>Procedure.
&nbsp;The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number<BR>of
required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the
quorum<BR>provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to
10 to make<BR>it consistent with the Bylaws.<BR><BR>Bob has filed the
motion. &nbsp;I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross<BR>has as
well. &nbsp;If we could have at least three more voters endorse
the<BR>motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same
ballot.<BR><BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Jon<BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From:
owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly<BR>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38
AM<BR>To: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion
to Adopt: Whois Conflicts<BR><BR>At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller
wrote:<BR>&gt;Hello all,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;this motion has been endorsed
by 5 members of the constituency<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Jordyn
Buchanan<BR>&gt;Marcus Faure<BR>&gt;Bruce Tonkin<BR>&gt;Paul
Stahura<BR>&gt;Tom Keller<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;I therefore ask to move the
motion to a vote at the earliest time<BR>&gt;possible.<BR><BR>Dear
Thomas: I also endorsed it.<BR><BR>Under the old Rules of Procedure, I
believe we need 14 days after the<BR>draft <BR>has been confirmed, then
another 4 days,<BR><BR>I am traveling and have not confirmed that time
schedule. &nbsp;I recognize<BR>that <BR>time is of the essence in this
motion.<BR><BR>I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time
schedule. &nbsp;He can<BR>reach <BR>me at
1.702.372.2890.<BR><BR>Regards,
BobC<BR><BR><BR>&gt;Best,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;tom </BLOCKQUOTE>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>