Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts

["Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I endorse the Rules of Procedure motion. I also suggest to resend it to the 
list with a more apropriate subject.

Yours,
Marcus


> Bob:  
> 
> The schedule looks right to me.  
> 
> Also, attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of
> Procedure.  The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number
> of required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the quorum
> provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to 10 to make
> it consistent with the Bylaws.
> 
> Bob has filed the motion.  I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross
> has as well.  If we could have at least three more voters endorse the
> motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same ballot.
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38 AM
> To: Registrars Constituency
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts
> 
> At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >this motion has been endorsed by 5 members of the constituency
> >
> >Jordyn Buchanan
> >Marcus Faure
> >Bruce Tonkin
> >Paul Stahura
> >Tom Keller
> >
> >I therefore ask to move the motion to a vote at the earliest time
> >possible.
> 
> Dear Thomas: I also endorsed it.
> 
> Under the old Rules of Procedure, I believe we need 14 days after the
> draft 
> has been confirmed, then another 4 days,
> 
> I am traveling and have not confirmed that time schedule.  I recognize
> that 
> time is of the essence in this motion.
> 
> I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time schedule.  He can
> reach 
> me at 1.702.372.2890.
> 
> Regards, BobC
> 
> 
> >Best,
> >
> >tom
> 
Content-Description: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.doc

[Attachment, skipping...]
Content-Description: RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.pdf

[Attachment, skipping...]