RE: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts
Bob: The schedule looks right to me. Also, attached is the current version of the proposed Rules of Procedure. The changes since Luxembourg are that we reduced the number of required endorsements from 5 to 3 and we changed the quorum provisions to reduce the minimum number of voters from 15 to 10 to make it consistent with the Bylaws. Bob has filed the motion. I have endorsed it, and I believe that Ross has as well. If we could have at least three more voters endorse the motion today or tomorrow, we could have both motions on the same ballot. Thanks. Jon -----Original Message----- From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F Connelly Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:38 AM To: Registrars Constituency Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to Adopt: Whois Conflicts At 12:51 AM 7/21/05, Thomas Keller wrote: >Hello all, > >this motion has been endorsed by 5 members of the constituency > >Jordyn Buchanan >Marcus Faure >Bruce Tonkin >Paul Stahura >Tom Keller > >I therefore ask to move the motion to a vote at the earliest time >possible. Dear Thomas: I also endorsed it. Under the old Rules of Procedure, I believe we need 14 days after the draft has been confirmed, then another 4 days, I am traveling and have not confirmed that time schedule. I recognize that time is of the essence in this motion. I would appreciate it if Jon would confirm the time schedule. He can reach me at 1.702.372.2890. Regards, BobC >Best, > >tom Attachment:
RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.doc Attachment:
RC Rules of Procedure July 18 2005 clean.pdf
|