<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] WIPO II
At 09:36 AM 1/26/04, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
On 1/26/2004 11:53 AM Robert F. Connelly noted that:
Dear Registrars: This morning during the WIPO II teleconference, I
relayed a grievance presented by several of our members that some of the
vendors for panels under the UDRP are though to lack objectivity and to
favor the arguments of the challenger as opposed to the respondents.
Jonathan Cohen, the Chair of the "committee" disagreed. He has offered
to present his figures at our meeting in Rome. Will such be of interest
to our members in attendance?
An objective discussion of the facts would be most interesting. Are their
also specific policy implications to this discussion?
Dear Ross: A very good question. I am on the RC Rome Agenda to discuss
WIPO II. There are policy issues a plenty to discuss. I'd like to be
permitted to invite David Maher to our meeting. David is the Registries
representative on the WIPO II committee. The position of the Registries is
quite similar to ours.
How does that grab you?
Personal regards, BobC
--
Regards,
-rwr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|