<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] RE: Acceptable Delivery Method (Fourth Draft of GAINING registrar form for transfers)
- To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Acceptable Delivery Method (Fourth Draft of GAINING registrar form for transfers)
- From: Larry Erlich <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:06:49 -0400
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- Organization: DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
- References: <AFEF39657AEEC34193C494DBD717922202356B06@phoenix.mit>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>
> Hello Larry,
>
> >
> > Is it possible for the gaining registrar approval "letter" to
> > be delivered by a method other than email? If not, does this
> > assume that if the registrant does not have a current email
> > address with the losing registrar, or does not have any email
> > access, they can't transfer registrar?
> >
>
> We have yet to see the proposed contractual changes etc, but my
> understanding of the policy development outcome was that you could send
> the form to the registrant contact via:
> - email, fax, or post
> (it using the contact information available in the WHOIS).
Thanks. This seems to indicate that the fax # needs
to be in the whois? Note that the fax is often
not in the whois. Melbourneit.com, DomainRegistry.com, Godaddy.com
don't have their fax # in the whois for example.
>
> The issue with voice is probably one of proof. Although I guess you
> could record a conversation where a notice was read out and an
> affirmative answer received.
I think that you need proof of the
affirmative answer either in writing or electronically except
in cases where the registrar has an existing relationship
with a customer (meaning the "registrant" has an existing
relationship - not a reseller).
> You may then need some way of verifying
> that the voice in the recording was the registrant. It is all
> technically possible - although an email is fairly cheap.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|