ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ispcp] Outreach

  • To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ispcp] Outreach
  • From: "tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 21:26:32 +0100
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338150394; bh=9FrxLWO4P1ngpBE4w7Zi6CBrAiHW379GwcqI6g+wZxE=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=GtdPJOqbvGOnmqkKR5vKSqa0d4fEL5V3PEQq1Qss5EjDxQcynXvYmjIuHevJ9G5SPLZJHLXdB0oCirkAxfBkUQSVsjfwnSNhGLAF8SnEUKjfoZ2EzRdOXXtEXpcWCPsWf+cB7onsuJ9MsRydHATi+V6gZzb5lxoV2kTz89di3g0=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=HFfNUtTB3VKvHJbrbKKNFaYXSET5hjDlh1kd525GxrRtC9MHp6O8ztB/gqgI4jhs3L5nttcl57q/6wWBUTuKqnV0iJNCoviuGDZrJekL7QNI9HqP14kmP55YWx4WSfd4HQeOA5ITz2TtGbj4kNaxfJior+oH/I2eWwzKkRHbJXM= ;
  • In-reply-to: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E5701596E1B9E77@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E5701596E1B9E77@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQJQtLlIdiNhSXD5x1C2ukg0UCz43pXXIrNw

Wolf-Ulrich

As one of those who does have some concerns over the fit of this work with
other initiatives, I think there are some broader issues for the
Constituency to consider before we offer support on the strategy to be
adopted by this group.

 

What is the timeframe for the comments you listed?

 

What is planned for the OTF between now and Prague?

 

Another item for discussion on Wednesday!

 

Regards

 

Tony

 

 

From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 27 May 2012 09:57
To: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ispcp] Outreach

 

All,

 

At our next call on coming Wednesday we should discuss the (still open)
outreach item (OTF = Outrech Task Force).

As you remember at the public ICANN meeting in San José I was chairing a
discussion on that, and a small discussion group was asked to follow up (J.
Berard, Ch. Gomes, B. Drake, R. Damak, myself e.a.). This group needs as an
input a clear layout of the constituency views on the subject in addressing
our specific concerns we have with the OTF proposal and our suggestions.

 

For your info I attach the OTF recommendations. Some GNSO members have
raised concerns re the general OTF approach and would like to see that
"project" being grounded. Others have just problems with the detailed OTF
structure and tasks.

 

The constituency should therefore comment on

*	allocating the survey to develop the outreach strategy (see 2.1,
page 3)
*	responsibility of the SGs/constituencies and the OTF for outreach
planning and implementation 
*	OTF structure (see 2.1, page 5+)
*	any other items of concern

 

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>