ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ispcp]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June

  • To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ispcp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June
  • From: "tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 21:19:38 +0100
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338149979; bh=XYdmJLAWmpqgs1/XcztXweNYJYXrLXtVipnjA1oqzzI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=A4OOMxMMmbmk6cxGPE0EeTzmmuHPKoe4tdRNlp0hVoa2R0hGyVaKCTeFB+P2JlBc8/NxYtkjbACW19IFjL5R6x1waz19deJioBMWkcXLJWK1VIgSt0V8I31yJukjZ2ZIdsER5tQqF+hkri4XvTsRRJcxbzjFPcBfjsLFeMQ4zy0=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=lHvAp7pl77DfXxvs0AFMqXhZQVfnjFTxtKgkaFOQl3GTV8++w5vF7E7EDzZnEiXja7uXhcvcSKWjJcj+pVNvVDblu0NwWMVbJXYko9LEruIkNu72NMll042g1QbdpRXNLkAjGbeMxmnPBwBJExw3HgFQfoAjkKcRmJKD+TtnzTA= ;
  • In-reply-to: <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E5701596E1B9E81@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • List-id: ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <45CAF695-1DEF-485C-98FD-52B35BF1B6D9@haven2.com> <D9F923A733D99945931EF9A6D3436E5701596E1B9E81@HE111646.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
  • Sender: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQFSPr6ZFPxxXGlLfTEcLCyt1rfkEgI3xhbpl8JQAgA=
I've added this to the agenda for this week's call.

It's certainly an important issue for the ISPCP.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 27 May 2012 12:11
To: mike@xxxxxxxxxx; ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and
resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June


Fully agreed, Mikey, we should weigh in. Do you have some experience with
the ICANN statement? I mean we need somebody steering the gang.
Should we fix that next Wednesday?


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ispcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Mike O'Connor
Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012 21:17
An: ispcp@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency
-- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June


hi all,

Patrick Jones just reminded me about this comment period.  we may want to
weigh in, no?

 
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-ssr-role-remit-17may12-en.
htm

i'd be interested in joining the gang of comment-drafters on this one.
anybody else interested?

mikey

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>