ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Review and Complaint / was: Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules

  • To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, joe Babtista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Review and Complaint / was: Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=qaNQn+r3siZtb1ftObhVSqGSVE7ryVMY/RZWFCZI5p/bcUBxRNmWh4d/JNOtrKfa5NR6mZg+zEwsTrBVhKD3hmy6prPfc58s4+AOMnjwQuVJJOKMcApcVhzCNuYyvSz4qVHzPuo2TGIKhAec+ZtSuHkux8MuiSatITSfntzo7+s=;
  • In-reply-to: <26238459.1188005344955.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I did it. Missed a much desired nap, but I went through Sr. Williams posts for the month of August. Interesting subject matter but entirely too convoluted in the areas of English and Logic. I had a Philosophy professor back at Northern Arizona who said; "if you like who you read, it ain't worth it". In this case it was damn well worth it.
   
  In no way did I find anything that could be called a motion to amend or proposed language for an amendment. There were some flailing attempts(I think) that would require more effort from the reader than was used to make the attempt. I had to conclude that on a whole the comments regarding the adoption of the rules and any amendments were solo attempts to derail the process.
   
  I have reviewed my process as a GA Chair and have concluded, I would not change anything in the past as regards Jeff Williams. In the future though I will not read, but appropriately file posts by Mr. Williams so that I can easily reference them later. Also note I will pick up any responsive posts to his posts.
   
  It is not my intention to allow trolls and intimidators to harm the hard work we have all done by simply staying here.
   
  By copy of this posts I am formally complaining regarding Jeff Williams' recent postings as being disruptive. In particular posting falsities with the specific intent that they disrupt ongoing activity on this list.
   
  Eric
  as Chair

jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
    body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}      body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}      Mr. Dierker and all,
   
    Yet another flip-flop?  Seem so here in these remarks below.  First
  draft rules, than Mr. dierker several times ask for amendments, several
  forum members posted amendments including myself three times, seconded
  Teds twice, and made a motion for another amendment, than voting in which
  all of 11 out of 200+ GA forum members voted.  Again durring the vote, Mr. 
  Dierker ask for amendments, and again I, Ted and two other members posted
  proposed amendments.  Than Mr. Dierker suggested no amending durring voting
  period which seems to be another flip-flop ergo poor process/procedure.  Than
  Debbie ask me to repost those amendments.  I said no because I and others
  have posted them several times already and they are avaliable in the archives
  of this GA forum.  Than in another flip-flop, Mr. Dierker decides that it doesn't
  matter what amendments essentially.  Than Debbie says she cannot remember
  any amendments being posted.  
   
    What a saga, eh!   But not really anything out of the ordinary for Mr. Dierker
  of given the history of the GA.



  -----Original Message----- 
From: Hugh Dierker 
Sent: Aug 24, 2007 7:15 PM 
To: GA 
Subject: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules 

  This being close of business in the Jurisdiction and time zone of ICANN, and there being no objection of process or substance, the proposed amendments to our list rules are adopted.
   
  I ask Madame Editor to make it so and publish the new Rules with amendments.
   
  Eric
  as Chair 
  'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


       
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>