ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules

  • To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:03:26 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=qUvmnlEainAHV9Ct3zEJAZujsUK0gh7mS24TXCU9MnniquImBOwCYIwH7WiINu8M; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR>
<P>Mr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; First and yet again for the 29th time, please delete or remove your</P>
<P>"Marketing Jargon" in your trailer record in your posts as it is offensive,</P>
<P>waste bandwidth by your own admission, which poor folks in Vietnam,</P>
<P>Cambodia, Bulgaria, and other less advantaged countries cannot afford.</P>
<P>So again, I have cleaned up&nbsp;this waste of bandwidth up for this semingly</P>
<P>errant behavior poster/member.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Secondly:</P>
<P>&nbsp; There was and is no defamination in my remarks outlining,</P>
<P>in brief the history of this and three other related threads.</P>
<P>&nbsp; I know, and anyone can check for themselves, that the archives bare out</P>
<P>my remarks and/or statements.&nbsp;I now also have three registered</P>
<P>experts whom have signed affidavits of same. &nbsp;If anyone is of any doubt of the</P>
<P>accuracy of my remarks,&nbsp;please feel free to check for yourselves.&nbsp; If Mr. Dierker </P>
<P>chooses to take exception, which from his remarks in response, just below, I </P>
<P>await his or anyone else&nbsp;service accordingly.&nbsp; <BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Aug 25, 2007 11:18 AM <BR>To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules <BR><BR>
<DIV>Appropriate postings,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I think general rules of Defamation should be the limit. It would not be appropriate to disparage another in their profession or assert that they have certain diseases or insanties. Referring to another onlist as a deadbeat would certainly be wrong. As always calling someone a liar is taboo. That is just for on this list, just like "in this office" or "in my home".</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>The same is not true of the Chair. There is no personal defilement that is out of bounds. So Jeff or anyone else can say as many bad things about the Chair as they can think of to say.</DIV>
<DIV>Herein lies the rub. The Chair is not required to read it. And if one persons posts are more likely than not carrying insults and false negative innuendos without facts to support them, then probably the Chair will elect not to read that poster. The sad thing for both parties is that they will miss out on the occassional positive contribution from each other. Something like always crying wolf.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<ZZZMETA content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name="GENERATOR">
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<ZZZMETA content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name="GENERATOR">
<DIV>Mr. Dierker and all,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp; Yet another flip-flop?&nbsp; Seem so here in these remarks below.&nbsp; First</DIV>
<DIV>draft rules, than Mr. dierker several times ask for amendments, several</DIV>
<DIV>forum members posted amendments including myself three times, seconded</DIV>
<DIV>Teds twice, and made a motion for another amendment, than voting in which</DIV>
<DIV>all of 11 out of 200+ GA forum members voted.&nbsp; Again durring the vote, Mr. </DIV>
<DIV>Dierker ask for amendments, and again I, Ted and two other members posted</DIV>
<DIV>proposed amendments.&nbsp; Than Mr. Dierker suggested no amending durring voting</DIV>
<DIV>period which seems to be another flip-flop ergo poor process/procedure.&nbsp; Than</DIV>
<DIV>Debbie ask me to repost those amendments.&nbsp; I said no because I and others</DIV>
<DIV>have posted them several times already and they are avaliable in the archives</DIV>
<DIV>of this GA forum.&nbsp; Than in another flip-flop, Mr. Dierker decides that it doesn't</DIV>
<DIV>matter what amendments essentially.&nbsp; Than Debbie says she cannot remember</DIV>
<DIV>any amendments being posted.&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp; What a saga, eh!&nbsp;&nbsp; But not really anything out of the ordinary for Mr. Dierker</DIV>
<DIV>of given the history of the GA.<BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Aug 24, 2007 7:15 PM <BR>To: GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules <BR><BR>
<DIV>This being close of business in the Jurisdiction and time zone of ICANN, and there being no objection of process or substance, the proposed amendments to our list rules are adopted.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I ask Madame Editor to make it so and publish the new Rules with amendments.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>as Chair&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<P>=======
<P>'Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail <A href="mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A></P></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>