ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules

  • To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:29:04 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=RTpLU+NLjCwWLG6N2J3aDDVTytcNFUhB/7VwYrMMxt/cIxF1AMZDA2oIUCyhOCXd; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR>
<P>Mr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Yet another flip-flop?&nbsp; Seem so here in these remarks below.&nbsp; First</P>
<P>draft rules, than Mr. dierker several times ask for amendments, several</P>
<P>forum members posted amendments including myself three times, seconded</P>
<P>Teds twice, and made a motion for another amendment, than voting in which</P>
<P>all of 11 out of 200+ GA forum members voted.&nbsp; Again durring the vote, Mr. </P>
<P>Dierker ask for amendments, and again I, Ted and two other members posted</P>
<P>proposed amendments.&nbsp; Than Mr. Dierker suggested no amending durring voting</P>
<P>period which seems to be another flip-flop ergo poor process/procedure.&nbsp; Than</P>
<P>Debbie ask me to repost those amendments.&nbsp; I said no because I and others</P>
<P>have posted them several times already and they are avaliable in the archives</P>
<P>of this GA forum.&nbsp; Than in another flip-flop, Mr. Dierker decides that it doesn't</P>
<P>matter what amendments essentially.&nbsp; Than Debbie says she cannot remember</P>
<P>any amendments being posted.&nbsp; </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; What a saga, eh!&nbsp;&nbsp; But not really anything out of the ordinary for Mr. Dierker</P>
<P>of given the history of the GA.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Aug 24, 2007 7:15 PM <BR>To: GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Adoption of proposed amendments to the list rules <BR><BR>
<DIV>This being close of business in the Jurisdiction and time zone of ICANN, and there being no objection of process or substance, the proposed amendments to our list rules are adopted.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I ask Madame Editor to make it so and publish the new Rules with amendments.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>as Chair&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>'Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail <A href="mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A></DIV></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>