Re: [ga] How to Protect Registrants

[JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny,
one of the difficulties of the ICANN process is that "1969 mails" 
archives cannot be perused, printed, worked on as a single document 
of reasonable presentation and readibility. Would you know/use a 
solution to that most irritating and time wasting problem? By any 
chance, would you have a single document with all your propositions?
All the best
jfc


At 01:57 22/08/2007, Danny Younger wrote:
> We have about three weeks left until the end of
> ICANN's consultation on how to protect registrants.
> I've sent in a bunch of comments so far, but probably
> still haven't covered the complete gamut of issues --
>
> I'd appreciate it if members of this list would review
> the public submissions and offer up suggestions as to
> what other issues should be addressed.  For example, I
> note that in pre-consultation commentary Wendy Seltzer
> has argued for the elimination of the "no third party
> beneficiaries" clause in the RAA.
>
> Doubtless there remain other recommendations that we
> as a group could still advance...
>
> some thoughts on formal ongoing representation of
> registrants in the GNSO might be in order.
>
> Comments that have already been submitted may be
> viewed here:
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/raa-consultation
>
> Those that wish to comment directly may post to this
> URL:  raa-consultation@xxxxxxxxx
>
> This is our one guaranteed chance to do something
> positive on behalf of the registrant community.  Your
> thoughts on this subject will be appreciated... and
> remember, it will probably be another decade before
> the RAA is revisited; let's do what we can now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: 
> mail, news, photos & more.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC