<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Nominating Committee Review
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Nominating Committee Review
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=P5EWhAUYJu6K3Lx0CzZyFGsEGidK/9UIJZsb0pjdI7YhJLOQR84jxk2bTifnva77gz2zeK1QUtqEEpp7FLQmHV9ZTTUuqTxQdBYKMwSbD3HhC7tkPCE8ZmjAbkU8MnwL9EPahBInC6h9nrAXH2U41nzAcxwppm1+cwkgud0yyHg=;
- In-reply-to: <712944.22585.qm@web52202.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From the "update" posted to the Review of the
Nominating Committee page:
The BGC's "NomCom Review Working Group" is guiding the
NomCom Review process and consists of Alejandro
Pisanty, Peter Dengate-Thrush, Njeri Rionge, Mouhamet
Diop, Jonathan Cohen and Steve Goldstein --
http://icann.org/reviews/nomcom-28feb07.htm
So, let's see...
We have a former ICANN Board member on the firm that
is doing the "independent review", and that firm is
being "guided" by three former ICANN directors and
three current ICANN directors
and somehow we are to believe that we'll get an
independent and unbiased Review with an outcome that
is not influenced or predetermined by those providing
such "guidance"...
... as I see it, there are very real probity issues
associated with excessive Board-member contact with
evalution panel members.
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|