<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Rate Reduction ( ICANN Review in order? )
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Rate Reduction ( ICANN Review in order? )
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:33:17 -0700
- Cc: icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, icann staff <icann-staff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <896899.41392.qm@web52912.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dr. Dierker and all,
Good point, and usually but not always, correct. Maybe
a ICANN Review is in order here? Or maybe ICANN would
rather use such funds a review would cost for bringing some
Haitians to the LA meeting instead?
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> You are saying that it is akin to raising your prices one week so
> you can have a sale the next? Has anyone done an 800K study on the
> industry declination of costs? Clearly it is a macro economic fact.
> But generally we see non responsiveness to actual costs in cartels.
>
> Eric
>
> "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> A $0.02 reduction in the ICANN fee, plus the $0.42 increase in the
> .com wholesale cost later this year, is still a minimum of a net $0.40
> increase to registrants. If ICANN wants to impress anyone, they need
> to demonstrate that all domain registration fees are declining like
> other technology products and services.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ted
> Prophet Partners Inc.
> http://www.ProphetPartners.com
> http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hugh Dierker
> To: ga
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:22 PM
> Subject: [ga] Rate Reduction
>
>
> On it's face this looks like a good and reasonably related benefit.
> I always wonder though when in any price is reduced by groups.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|