RE: [ga] Draft GA List Rules

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well there is no sense in doing all this work and not addressing the position of chair.
  Liaison is a tougher nut. Some bodies designate who may report from the GA.
  But I say let us set one up and make it optional to install said liaison.
   
  Deemed Adopted. This is something we can address as far as the chair position goes. The chair may deem something adopted if there is ---------- or no opposition, once published for 10 days. Probably publish every day for 10 days. Default I believe is the concept. At any rate we need it due to ebb and flow apathy here.
   
  Another word for Individual is self. It should be accepted that individuals here will act within their own self interest. And we can see through history that individuals here will speak quite loudly when something, someone or some policy is not in their interests. Therefor I feel confident that adopting a default acceptance policy is a good idea. And If someone comes out strongly for or against, another will counter. 
   
  Eric

Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      Hi Eric
   
  I think we need to add more rules for election and role of Chair (including, perhaps, official/unofficial liaison officer).  I think we should then ask the list to say if they disagree with the rules and I feel that a silence should be seen as agreement to implement.  
   
  Best
   
  Debbie

      
---------------------------------
  From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hugh Dierker
Sent: 10 July 2007 18:41
To: GA
Subject: Re: [ga] Draft GA List Rules


  
  I am not going to, not, move forward with this. I will submit this to the Council and the secretariat to update our rules. To be convinced I should act otherwise I will need to see specific amendments or a wholly new set.
   
  Eric

Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    Good Day,
   
  I could do this a lot of ways but decided on two methods. I was going to keep the identity of the person who worked so hard on this anonymous for a few days. This was to keep the debate centered on prinicples and not personality. But then I decided the Debbie Garside is tough enough to handle it and members will address the issue after giving some thanks. The second thing I did was to keep it rough and in the word format with corrections still marked, this will help assure that only those with real interest will work on it and that we act as though it is a work in progress not finished perfection. 
  It should be noted that any glaring errors are probably mine as a result of tampering.
   
  It would be a fair assesment that we are getting somewhere as a body. 
   
  I consider it appropriate to work on a second list probably not just what 
George wants, but sooner or later he will learn to play with others. I am working on getting us two seperate sublists.
   
  Avri Doria was thoughtful and caring enough to write us and asked simply that we address;
  "ask you all to start discussing issues related to the GSNO  
and ICANN policy." So I do believe we should all try and slant our debates in that way.
   
  attached;
   
    
---------------------------------
  Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. 

    
---------------------------------
  Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. 

       
---------------------------------
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.