<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN kicks TLD applicants
- To: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN kicks TLD applicants
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 05:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=zKQfQCsejyR6wd/G2WG0+89zH+OnjMFgBuwcsr/VTppaOlUR2SEmuz1NXuUeuZlhDJ9P8CaO6ED8VjYY8Vw1kFDzKlwK/kCwRbMzN8JXDKrbw4J54pgyo1vYXZALqCzRA/3Yg2syOXsORGKFcMAdBrL6ZFcDry88UKznMsu1Rj8=;
- In-reply-to: <46421170.4080505@cavebear.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As new considerations arise I believe this should be revisited.
Eric
Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The following statement from ICANN staff, apparently a statement not
authorized by the board, to be one of the host hideous thing to ever be
emitted by ICANN. Given the statements from ICANN's highest authorities
that the year 2000 applicants who did not get the nod at that time were
merely placed on hold, this statement smacks of duplicity or worse.
In my mind it is tantamount to ICANN expropriating over $2,000,000, plus
interest for 7 years, plus the priority position for certain names, from
those who were not rejected, but not approved, in year 2000.
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/schwartz-to-hemphill-24jan07.pdf
To add to this, there are rumors now that ICANN wants new TLD
applications to be accompanied by fees of one to two million US dollars.
Absurd. Unjustified. Despicable.
--karl--
---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|