Re: [ga] Re: [RAA] working group to design a better RAA

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joop and all,

What distractions, and distractions from what exactly are you
referring to for a list based WG, Joop?

[RAA] is in the subject line, and this is also what Dr. Dierker had
already suggested.

CC'ing is not a bad thing depending on if whom is being CC'ed is
a list member or not.  If not CC'ing is for informational purposes
and is beneficial as such.  Otherwise CC'ing is overly redundant.

Joop Teernstra wrote:

>    At 12:28 a.m. 10/04/2007, kidsearch wrote:
> >Eric, there is a problem I'd like to address. Whenever a WG is formed
> but
> >still posts to the list, even with the subject line changed, people
> not
> >involved in the WG continue to comment. I understand the need for
> >transparency and agree with anything that makes things more
> transparent.
> >However, I run a nonprofit org and whenever a committee is formed to
> >discuss a particular topic, they do it among themselves and take
> minutes
> >so others can read what went on in those discussions. Then the
> committee
> >reports their findings back to the board. it's efficient.
> >
> >I think a WG should have their own mailing list and archives that
> anyone
> >can read. If you really want to get something done, then a WG has to
> be
> >formed and allowed to get their work done, then report their findings
> back
> >to the list. That's my opinion.
> >
>
> Eric,
>
> I agree with Chris. We can report weekly or fortnightly to the list,
> but in
> order to get work done, we need to be free from distractions and
> possible
> trolling.
> As long as we have to operate by cc-ing, I would like to ask WG
> participants to put [RAA] in the subject line.
>
>
> -joop-
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827