ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: [NA-Discuss] NARALO Formation Meeting

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Michael Maranda <mmaranda@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [NA-Discuss] NARALO Formation Meeting
  • From: Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:28:22 -0400
  • Cc: ICANN At Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, NA Discuss <na-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender:message-id; b=Qg4KaMDZXUlCL33H1OJDCHOi4+vAbCdP/ZV0KlNprXr/5RAigA2SdIjllgj/qoYJW8BICCzlsibM8G1F2t+bJfWQ+405YzZNDGS/VEJxohLyrR53Hc39I7q3+DjpDRU445SYGRypaGFytAu9lbgAtslQtX/yamMwo1TpF8XkWL8=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender:message-id; b=KAbHdNYAq0uio/tW3njCJFacx8SMGLxFS9rwOgvuEaVwcpI1HRzv1bwDDC4YQ3sGgakEAz1TAKWPS1E92OCTJZ7drHQ+eG0bT8dUuH4EtdMGaKR3C2rlPM8XWyegsTUgAFeA6UqNVCqQePaKp8+y/cCvIcgnPTDekxcQYhuYMTY=
  • In-reply-to: <20070410022500.37277.qmail@web52212.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
  • References: <3feff8d60704091844j46d5b165r30f1cd2ad40d6d92@mail.gmail.com> <20070410022500.37277.qmail@web52212.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny,
from what I read in the pdf, and the by-laws, I don't see how did you reach to your conclusions:


At 07:25 PM 4/9/2007 -0700, Danny Younger wrote:
What is particular disturbing is that this applicant
answered "NO" to the question:  "Is your organization
constituted so that participation by individual
Internet users who are citizens or residents of
countries within the Geographic Region in which your
organization is based will predominate in your
organization's operation?"

As a "YES" answer is required by the ICANN Bylaws
(Article XI Section 2 #4i), this candidate ALS should
not, under any circumstances, be granted an accredited
ALS status,

I mean - the answer is actually "No. Our organization has an international focus, and 15 percent of our users are from foreign countries..."
Which, when seeing the question "is your organization constituted so that participation by individual Internet users who are citizens or residents of countries within the geographic region in which your organization is based will predominate in your organization's operation", makes the other 85 % of their users feel somewhat... regionless?



Best,
Veni





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>