ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: is ICANN or is ICANN not?

  • To: Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Re: is ICANN or is ICANN not?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:19:20 +0100
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <200701292211.l0TMBgYm017569@smtp01.icann.org>
  • Organization: NIC France
  • References: <200701290221.l0T2LepC000345@pechora2.icann.org> <200701292211.l0TMBgYm017569@smtp01.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:11:52PM +0100,
 Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 876 lines which said:

> "What should, in your opinion, IANA do in case ISO decides to
> reallocate SU [to a different country]?"

Note that it is purely theoretical since, as Elisabeth explained, the
ISO MA committed to "no reallocation before 50 years", after the
glitch of ".cs".

Should it happen, I would say that IANA should not blindly follow ISO
in that mistake.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>