<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
- To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:33:33 +0100
- Cc: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdEJ6H4uzKpL+l/TMGJzLl51MtbAAAICs+A
- Thread-topic: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
Very good conclusion, Jeff! I guess we are closer to the source of all
problems than we might expect...
If I was Google I would be doing my best to penetrate ICANN in order to
keep the (tasting, etc.) business running :-)))
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeff Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:26 AM
To: Hugh Dierker
Cc: kidsearch; General Assembly of the DNSO; ianburrows_au@xxxxxxxxx;
icann board address; icann staff; Kathy Smith
Subject: Re: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
Dr. Dierker, Chris and all,
Exactly and more to the point or point's right here Chris. Another
MONEY related benefit would be nearly directly to Google for many
obvious reasons. Doesn't Vinton still work for Google?
Isn't he still also a Bod member of ICANN? Hummmmm, interesting, eh?
Uhm, what happened to the Emperors cloths??
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|