RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>]

That would work if the person sent to ICANN was instructed to be in favour
of the tasting and other similar practices.
It so happens that he is openly against, so another potentially good
conspiracy theory failing miserably...

Cheers,
Roberto

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dominik Filipp
> Sent: 30 January 2007 09:34
> To: Jeff Williams
> Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO
> Subject: RE: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
> 
> Very good conclusion, Jeff! I guess we are closer to the 
> source of all problems than we might expect...
> 
> If I was Google I would be doing my best to penetrate ICANN 
> in order to keep the (tasting, etc.) business running :-)))
> 
> Dominik
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:26 AM
> To: Hugh Dierker
> Cc: kidsearch; General Assembly of the DNSO; 
> ianburrows_au@xxxxxxxxx; icann board address; icann staff; Kathy Smith
> Subject: Re: [ga] Why the .XXX Domain is a Bad Idea That Won't Die
> 
> Dr. Dierker, Chris and all,
> 
>   Exactly and more to the point or point's right here Chris.  
> Another MONEY related benefit would be nearly directly to 
> Google for many obvious reasons.  Doesn't Vinton still work 
> for Google?
> Isn't he still also a Bod member of ICANN?  Hummmmm, interesting, eh?
> Uhm, what happened to the Emperors cloths??