Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You say you answer questions, so I keep putting in the same question Veni in 
hopes you will actually do so instead of criticizing the way people type 
into the list. If you are done with correcting people's manner and grammer 
could you answer this question?

If 99% of the public comments are against a proposal, then how do you 
justify saying that A. You pay attention to the bottom up consensus on 
issues and B. That you are serving the public good by going against what the 
public said they wanted?

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Andy Gardner" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry 
agreements by 13-0


> I guess your language says it all.
> When people have no arguments, they become rude and violent.
> But we all know what Salvor Hardin said in Asimov's Foundation about 
> violence.
>
> So, what would it be, Andy? Rudeness or dialogue?
>
> veni
>
> On 12/10/06, Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Veni Markovski wrote:
> >
> > > One of the reasons today some people spent half of their time
> > > working for the public benefit as ICANN Board Directors is
> >
> > Whoop! Whoop! Oxymoron alert!!!!
> >
> > PUBLIC BENEFIT MY ARSE!