ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0

  • To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0
  • From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:21:00 -0500
  • Cc: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=W1Ylx9FDiyFX2mJ4HbtpghhOna08uEtFeXDFeDP44QFJxt+7qk1xloqpanlAk9aaXxSgXGSW3COv6rH3lj3CIZHNxNhvsoC6ciQUayv+wIb0hAfb+IFsMBzyXTnU6L8ymk/XQwGT0+pyF5UKB9iPSR5G9qw115aD70MLdFLNn9o=
  • In-reply-to: <724350.59892.qm@web52209.mail.yahoo.com>
  • References: <200612081936.kB8Jaued016781@mxr.isoc.bg> <724350.59892.qm@web52209.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Danny,
as usual (and very much in confirming what I just wrote), you have an
opinion, and you state it.
It sounds like a mantra, "What I say is right, because it's true". Or
"What I say is true, because it's right".

That's why nothing happens, because by insulting people, you just push
them away. Then, even when you make a good event, like the one about
Whois in NY, it's being lost in the waterfall of words.

veni

On 12/8/06, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
As usual, those that occupy seats on the Board (or
former Board members) have a real problem
understanding what is meant by "public interest"
(they're too busy focusing on their own organizational
self-interest that takes priority over the public
good).

They also have no grasp whatsoever on who represents
that public interest within ICANN (which, I suppose,
is understandable in view of the fact that ICANN
formally shut down the only body that allowed members
of the public to aggregate and to elect their own
leadership -- the DNSO General Assembly).

When you deliberately exclude the public in such
fashion and eliminate all publicly elected directors
from the governing Board, you reap the wrath of the
community and the bashing continues unabated.



--- Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 02:18 PM 08.12.2006 '?.'  -0500, kidsearch wrote:
> >I have to agree. But it is not unexpected. The
> ICANN Board has
> >absolutley no regard for the public wishes or
> benefit. Yes, Veni,
> >since the vote was unanimous, obviously you are
> included in that.
>
> It's good you mention that. It also makes a lot of
> sense to see who
> of the directors / former directors reads the least
> ;), and you know that.
>
> However, now that I am not on the Board, I am more
> free to talk, too.
> There have always been people bashing ICANN for one
> or another
> decision. Can you define what you mean by "public
> wishes or benefit"?
> Is the GA list representing the "public wishes or
> benefit"? Or it's
> the GNSO council? Or someone else?
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
>
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com
>
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>