ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote

  • To: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:00:13 -0700
  • Cc: Roberto Gaetano <ploki_xyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <BAY104-F30258E613EE920DFB58D159A220@phx.gbl> <041701c6dbf8$dae8cca0$0201a8c0@chris>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Chris and all,

  Haven't we had these discussions before?

kidsearch wrote:

> I don't see a problem with a membership fee. It could be much lower and
> there could be provisions to provide waivers to anyone proving they are
> below poverty level. But at least they have some say in whats happening. If
> anyone thinks that is not an improvement on ICANN's current methods, please
> chime in and tell us why it won't work as usual.
>
> Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> http://icann.thingsthatjustpissmeoff.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roberto Gaetano" <ploki_xyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:38 AM
> Subject: RE: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
>
> > Hi, Danny.
> >
> > Are you suggesting that ICANN applies the same rules that Nominet applies
> > for membership and elections? I suggest you check below before answering.
> >
> > http://www.nominet.org.uk/governance/members/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
> > >Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Kieren McCarthy contrasts the completely open and
> > >transparent elections at Nominet with the
> > >ultra-secretive process used to select ICANN Board
> > >members.
> > >
> > >See
> > >http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/nominet_icann_boards/
> > >
> > >Any large international firm can hold a worldwide
> > >shareholder's vote and elect directors to a board.  So
> > >why is ICANN unwilling to let it's pool of registrants
> > >elect their own directors?  Why must we put up with
> > >this hidden-from-view back-room approach?
> > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date: 9/18/06
> >
> >

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>