<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Synopsis of GA comments on new TLDs
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Synopsis of GA comments on new TLDs
- From: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:55:39 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
Danny,
In the document entitled "Comments from the General Assemblyʼs Internet
Users" footnote #38 should be changed to
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg03272.html
Also, footnote #72 ought to be changed to Comments from the General
Assemblyʼs Internet Users
Footnote #78 is wrong. I did make statements on "on the need for
representation for individuals in the TLD decision-making process" but the
footnote url is wrong; I don't know what the correct one is.
Footnote #87 is also wrong, the referenced url is a staement by Jeff
Williams and not myself.
Footnote #99 is also a mis-reference see the url:
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg03588.html which does
not correspond to "gggg Sotiris Sotiropoulis remarks: “The fact
that the dns is, practically speaking, well nigh infinite does not in any
way warrant the idea that it ought to be infinitely populated” "
Footnote #158 is also a mis-reference and misstatement.
Footnote #172 is also a mis-reference.
Footnote #187 is also a mis-statement, your wording makes it sound as if I
am in support of regional TLD endeavours such as a .lac or .cat when, in
fact, I am not in favour of such regional TLDs. What I stated was that I
favoured a subdomain tree for existing ccTLDs that would cover any need
for geographical specificity.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> A synopsis of recent GA discussions relating to the
> GNSO PDP on new TLDs has been posted:
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/new-gtlds-pdp-comments/msg00018.html
>
> Thank you again for your participation in this effort.
>
> Best wishes,
> Danny
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|