Re: [ga] Synopsis of GA comments on new TLDs

[Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sotiris,

When I compiled the report, the links were correct --
now they appear to be off by one digit (which is why
you are reporting so many mis-references).  I wonder
if someone in list management many have removed an
earlier posting which resulted in the links being
messed up now...

--- sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Danny,
> 
> In the document entitled "Comments from the General
> Assembly¢s Internet
> Users" footnote #38 should be changed to
>
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg03272.html
> 
> Also, footnote #72 ought to be changed to Comments
> from the General
> Assembly¢s Internet Users
> 
> Footnote #78 is wrong.  I did make statements on "on
> the need for
> representation for individuals in the TLD
> decision-making process" but the
> footnote url is wrong; I don't know what the correct
> one is.
> 
> Footnote #87 is also wrong, the referenced url is a
> staement by Jeff
> Williams and not myself.
> 
> Footnote #99 is also a mis-reference see the url:
>
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg03588.html
>  which does
> not correspond to "gggg Sotiris Sotiropoulis
> remarks:  ?The fact
> that the dns is, practically speaking, well nigh
> infinite does not in any
> way warrant the idea that it ought to be infinitely
> populated? "
> 
> Footnote #158 is also a mis-reference and
> misstatement.
> 
> Footnote #172 is also a mis-reference.
> 
> Footnote #187 is also a mis-statement, your wording
> makes it sound as if I
> am in support of regional TLD endeavours such as a
> .lac or .cat when, in
> fact, I am not in favour of such regional TLDs. 
> What I stated was that I
> favoured a subdomain tree for existing ccTLDs that
> would cover any need
> for geographical specificity.
> 
> 
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> 
> > A synopsis of recent GA discussions relating to
> the
> > GNSO PDP on new TLDs has been posted:
> >
>
http://forum.icann.org/lists/new-gtlds-pdp-comments/msg00018.html
> >
> > Thank you again for your participation in this
> effort.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Danny
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com