Re: [ga] Anniversary of ALAC Self-Review

[sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

This is exactly why I asked Mr. Vittorio Bertola if perhaps the alac(k)
review would be presented this time next year...

It started off not being a personal thing for me as I thought surely
Vittorio was an unwitting (and naive) victim of ICANN forces which were
quite without his ken of understanding; let alone his conscious
complicity...

Today, I do not feel that way.  It has become personal.  Vittorio Bertola
has lied to the At Large Community - to all of us - repeatedly.  It is
quite obvious to me (and others, I'm sure) that Mr. Bertola's half-baked
responses (when he degins to even respond) to our queries, are intentially
ambiguous and patronizing.  I detest such tactics, along with those who
use them.

If he had even an inkling of personal honour, he would immediately admit
the alac he so desired is an utter failure and resign forthwith.

For Shame!  Shame on you Mr. Berotla.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

P.S. Due to an unforeseen personal incident, I was unable to attend ICANN
Vancouver.  Had I done so, I would have had to fight an uncontrollable
urge to vomit from some of the things I heard on the webcast.


> Vittorio,
>
> Today marks one full year since the ALAC initiated
> their self-review process.  Please note the comment
> made by Izumi on 3 Dec. 2004:
>
> "We are now making our own internal review and
> hopefully the result in a shape of a position paper
> will be finalized within 2 months time. In this
> excersise we will evaluate our own performance, as
> well as the situation and conditions surrounding
> AtLarge, both within and outside of ICANN world."
> http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00828.html
>
> Even the DNSO-Review working group with over a hundred
> members (chaired by Y.J.Park) managed to finish their
> initial review cycle in less than 3 months.
>
> The Committee has had enough time, don't you think?
>
>
> --- Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Danny Younger ha scritto:
>> > Vittorio,
>> >
>> > When can we expect to see the ALAC Self-Review
>> > published?  It would be appreciated if the
>> document
>> > could be made available prior to the conclusion of
>> the
>> > Public Comment Forum.
>>
>> It is on the agenda for today's ALAC meeting (which
>> is before the Public
>> Forum). However, one of the options we have on the
>> table is to go
>> through one more drafting cycle, as some members
>> would like to have some
>> more time to review the document and ensure that
>> their point of view is
>> adequately reflected. So we are not sure whether we
>> will actually
>> release it here in Vancouver.
>> --
>> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a]
>> bertola.eu.org]<-----
>> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>