ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ALAC Self-Review


Jeff wrote: "Vittorio, yet again you demonstrate your lack of creditability
NO WGIG representative truly or legitimately represented any
stakeholder/user as they were all appointed not elected. So please got of
this nonsense!"

Unlike you jeff, who is Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k
members/stakeholders strong!). Speaking of credibility.

Chris McElroy, President,
Kidsearch Network
http://www.KidsearchNetwork.org
http://www.MissingChildrenBlog.com
missingkids@xxxxxxxxx



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "icann
board address" <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>; "WGIG" <wgig@xxxxxxx>; "Paul Twomey"
<twomey@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] ALAC Self-Review


> Vittorio and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
> stakeholders/users,
>
>   Vittorio, yet again you demonstrate your lack of creditability
> NO WGIG representative truly or legitimately represented
> any stakeholder/user as they were all appointed not elected.
> So please got of this nonsense!
>
> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
> > Danny Younger ha scritto:
> > > I call to your attention the following assessment of
> > > the ALAC that has emerged from the WSIS process:
> > >
> > > "Recognizing that the ICANN At-Large Advisory
> > > Committee (ALAC) is an inadequate attempt to give
> > > representation to the relatively unorganized
> > > constituency of users, this should be remedied in the
> > > very near term."
> > > http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/pc3/contributions/sca/SouthCentre-23.doc
> >
> > To be fair, that assessment comes from just one of the many comments
> > that were submitted by individual groups during the process. Generally
> > speaking, you may want to review the assessments in the WGIG Report and
> > Background Report as a source of opinions that, at least, were agreed
> > among a group of varied people representing many stakeholders.
> >
> > > As the ALAC continues to be not much more than a very
> > > pale version of Non-Commercial Constituency, have you
> > > at all considered the possibility of merging with
> > > NCUC?
> >
> > Sure. This has been among the subjects of discussion of our (now usual)
> > joint meeting with the NCUC, both in Cape Town and in Mar del Plata, as
> > I remember. It seems to me that both constituencies consider more useful
> > to the cause of non commercial and individual users of the Internet to
> > continue cooperating in their different roles, so that we can act
> > together on two fronts.
> >
> > > I believe that the At-Large can find a better avenue
> > > for representation within the ICANN process through
> > > recourse to a General Assembly approach (similar to
> > > that which was available under the old DNSO).
> > >
> > > When can we expect your self-review to become public?
> >
> > We haven't discussed the matter yet, but we plan to finalize the review
> > by the Vancouver meeting, if possible. If you will be there, we may
> > discuss this in person.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> > http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>